-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Add FilterBuilder::is_optimize_beneficial #8782
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @pepijnve -- this looks great to me
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Compute an optimised representation of the provided `filter` mask that can be | ||
| /// Compute an optimized representation of the provided `filter` mask that can be |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100% for consistent (american) spelling
|
Since I had some thoughts about comments, I'll just push them directly to the PR |
…w-rs into optimize_filter_beneficial
|
CI was failing due to which was fixed in arrow-go I merged up to get a clean run |
Which issue does this PR close?
FilterBuilder::optimizeor not #8781.Rationale for this change
See problem statement in #8781
What changes are included in this PR?
multiple_arrayshas been moved toFilterBuilderand made publicis_optimize_beneficialto make it intention revealing rather than a description of the implementationAre these changes tested?
No functional changes
Are there any user-facing changes?
No breaking changes