Skip to content

Conversation

@blaginin
Copy link
Collaborator

@blaginin blaginin commented Oct 23, 2025

All easy cases from #18185 (that are nicely-ish displayed in git diff).

Note on preserving comments: if it was note about what should happen (or what will be tested), it's placed on top of the snapshot. If that's something that comments part of the plan, I put it below the plan

@blaginin blaginin self-assigned this Oct 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the core Core DataFusion crate label Oct 23, 2025
@blaginin blaginin requested a review from alamb October 23, 2025 19:25
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @blaginin

I will admit I didn't review each line of this PR in super detail, but I reviewd all the lines and I spot checked a few of the tests in more detail and it looked really good.

Thank you for pusing along this project

assert_eq!(captured_join_type, join_type.to_string());

insta::allow_duplicates! {insta::assert_snapshot!(modified_plan, @r"
HashJoinExec: mode=Partitioned, join_type=..., on=[(AA@1, a1@5), (B@2, b1@6), (C@3, c@2)]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice

@alamb alamb added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit e432d55 Oct 29, 2025
29 checks passed
@blaginin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thank you!! now the last one 🥁

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Oct 29, 2025

thank you!! now the last one 🥁

So close!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core Core DataFusion crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants