Skip to content

Conversation

@clareliguori
Copy link
Member

Summary

Changes

Kiro recently released one-click install for MCP servers: https://kiro.dev/docs/mcp/servers/#share-your-mcp-server

This change adds a one-click install button for each MCP server in the README (thank you to Kiro for generating a script that let me automate this!)

User experience

See working example here:
https://github.com/clareliguori/awslabs-mcp/blob/one-click-install/README.md#available-mcp-servers-quick-installation

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

  • I have reviewed the contributing guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of this change
  • Changes have been tested
  • Changes are documented

Is this a breaking change? (Y/N) N

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the project license.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 13, 2025 00:11
@clareliguori clareliguori requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2025 00:11
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.42%. Comparing base (cfe3eb6) to head (a754331).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1733   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.42%   90.42%           
=======================================
  Files         851      851           
  Lines       63317    63317           
  Branches    10253    10253           
=======================================
  Hits        57254    57254           
  Misses       3772     3772           
  Partials     2291     2291           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@clareliguori clareliguori force-pushed the one-click-install branch 2 times, most recently from ccc15e8 to 53ff134 Compare November 21, 2025 17:18
@clareliguori clareliguori force-pushed the one-click-install branch 3 times, most recently from 0af002a to 0b94b24 Compare December 1, 2025 18:57
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust self-assigned this Dec 1, 2025
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust moved this from To triage to In progress in awslabs/mcp Project Dec 1, 2025
Copy link
Member

@anitalewis anitalewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust added the ready-for-merge Folks believe this is ready to merge label Dec 2, 2025
@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 2, 2025
Copy link
Member

@scottschreckengaust scottschreckengaust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Merged via the queue into awslabs:main with commit e0063f3 Dec 2, 2025
150 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in awslabs/mcp Project Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-merge Folks believe this is ready to merge

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants