Skip to content

Conversation

espindola
Copy link
Contributor

I want to move the manual async bits to the Waitlist implementation,
but for that I need to change the locks, which should be done in its
own patch.

This at least already makes the manual async code quite a bit smaller.

This makes the future implementation private. This is a braking
change, but:

* It is unlikely anyone was using GetConn directly instead of just
  awaiting it.

* This opens the way for replacing the manual implementation with an
  async fn.
Avoiding the manual implementation of Future makes this code quite a
bit simpler IMHO.
I want to move the manual async bits to the Waitlist implementation,
but for that I need to change the locks, which should be done in its
own patch.

This at least already makes the manual async code quite a bit smaller.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant