WIP: Do not use readiness port on worker by default #464
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: work in progress
Thought: We could split this PR and just add the logic to conditionally add the nc call and then operators could specifically set
-1on the readiness port to remove this hang if necessary.Fixes #256
Thanks for contributing to the
capi_release. To speed up the process of reviewing your pull request please provide us with:A short explanation of the proposed change:
An explanation of the use cases your change solves
Links to any other associated PRs
I have viewed signed and have submitted the Contributor License Agreement
I have made this pull request to the
developbranchI have run CF Acceptance Tests on bosh lite