⚡️ Speed up function time_based_cache by 11%
#141
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 11% (0.11x) speedup for
time_based_cacheinsrc/dsa/caching_memoization.py⏱️ Runtime :
78.4 microseconds→70.3 microseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves an 11% speedup by eliminating expensive string operations in cache key generation and streamlining cache lookups.
Key optimizations:
Tuple-based cache keys instead of string concatenation: The original code builds cache keys by calling
repr()on each argument and joining them with colons (":".join(key_parts)). The optimized version uses tuples directly as keys -(args, tuple(sorted(kwargs.items())))when kwargs exist, or justargswhen no kwargs. This eliminates multiple string allocations and concatenations.Single cache lookup with
dict.get(): Instead of checkingkey in cachefollowed bycache[key], the optimized code usescache.get(key)which performs only one hash lookup and returnsNoneif the key doesn't exist.Conditional key construction: Only processes kwargs when they exist, avoiding unnecessary tuple creation for the common case of functions with only positional arguments.
Why this is faster:
Best suited for: Functions with simple argument types that are called frequently, especially those with only positional arguments or consistent kwargs patterns. The optimization is most effective when cache hit rates are high, as the key generation savings compound with each cache access.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
codeflash_hypothesis_399nzc3e/test_hypothesis.py::test_fuzz_time_based_cachetest_dsa_nodes.py::test_cache_hittest_dsa_nodes.py::test_different_argumentstest_dsa_nodes.py::test_different_cache_instancestest_dsa_nodes.py::test_keyword_arguments🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_fb1xiyqb/tmp2ko0xvtp/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_time_based_cacheTo edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-time_based_cache-mha2qdvmand push.