Skip to content

feat(terminal): add toggle to enable/disable the built-in terminal #99

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arjunmahishi
Copy link

Introduce a new enable option in the terminal configuration to allow users to enable or disable the built-in terminal functionality entirely. Updated relevant logic to respect this setting, ensuring terminal-related features are only initialized and executed when enabled.

  • Added enable field to terminal config and default settings.
  • Updated terminal-related functions to check is_enabled before execution.
  • Enhanced documentation with instructions for external Claude Code usage.
  • Added unit tests to mock and validate is_enabled behavior.

This change improves flexibility for users who prefer to disable the built-in terminal and use an external claude code instance.


<will shortly add demo screenshot/video of this>

Introduce a new `enable` option in the terminal configuration to allow
users to enable or disable the built-in terminal functionality entirely.
Updated relevant logic to respect this setting, ensuring
terminal-related features are only initialized and executed when
enabled.

- Added `enable` field to terminal config and default settings.
- Updated terminal-related functions to check `is_enabled` before
  execution.
- Enhanced documentation with instructions for external Claude Code
  usage.
- Added unit tests to mock and validate `is_enabled` behavior.

This change improves flexibility for users who prefer to disable the
built-in terminal and use an external claude code instance.
@arjunmahishi
Copy link
Author

arjunmahishi commented Aug 2, 2025

Ohh there are already 2 PRs doing something similar 😅
Just saw them

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant