Fix typo in flashloans solvers tutorial

[harisang]

Fixing a small typo.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced flashloan router documentation with clearer encoding specifications, explicitly detailing argument types and ordering for improved clarity on router functionality.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
docs	Ready	Preview	Nov 24, 2025 8:01am

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This PR clarifies the documentation of the flashloan router call encoding in the solvers tutorial by replacing a generic narrative description with an explicit, structured specification that documents the two call arguments and their types.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation clarifications for flashloan router encoding docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/solvers/flashloans_support.md	Updated encoding description to explicitly specify the flashloan router call signature with two arguments: Loan.Data[] and settlement calldata, replacing a generic narrative explanation

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3–5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Add flashloans tutorial #542: Modifies the same documentation page and introduces the flashloans tutorial that this PR clarifies
• Flashloans follow-up: rework comments #466: Updates documentation for flashloan router encoding specifications

Suggested reviewers

• MartinquaXD

Poem

🐰 A hop through docs so clear and bright,
Where flashloan routers now shine in light!
Two arguments typed, no mystery here,
The encoding's explicit—knowledge sincere! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description 'Fixing a small typo.' is minimal and lacks detailed explanation of what was changed and why, falling short of the template requirements for structured context.	Expand the description to follow the template: explain what typo was fixed and why it matters. Include a detailed 'Changes' section listing the specific corrections made.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Fix typo in flashloans solvers tutorial' accurately reflects the main change: correcting a typo in the flashloans tutorial documentation.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch harisang-patch-2

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25e2c88 and 053940d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/solvers/flashloans_support.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/solvers/flashloans_support.md

40-40: Link text should be descriptive

(MD059, descriptive-link-text)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/cow-protocol/tutorials/solvers/flashloans_support.md (2)

40-42: PR scope may exceed the described "typo fix".

The changes restructure the documentation of the flashloanAndSettle() call encoding to be more explicit and structured (with explicit argument types and ordering), which is a documentation improvement. However, the PR title ("Fix typo") suggests a smaller, correctness-focused change. This appears to be a documentation restructuring/clarification rather than a typo correction.

Please confirm whether this scope is intentional. If so, consider updating the PR title and description to better reflect the nature of these changes.

---

40-40: Static analysis hint appears to be a false positive.

The markdown linter flagged the link text "[flashloan router]" as non-descriptive (MD059), but the text accurately describes the destination resource (the IFlashloanRouter contract documentation) and is contextually clear. This appears to be a false positive that does not require remediation.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}