Skip to content

Conversation

@lrhn
Copy link
Member

@lrhn lrhn commented Oct 20, 2025

Avoid iterating the same thing more than once (lists, strings using indexOf).
Use newer language features where appropriate.
Put repeated code into helper functions.

Avoid iterating the same thing more than once.
Use newer language features wher appropriate.
Put duplicate code into helper functions.
@lrhn lrhn requested a review from kevmoo October 20, 2025 11:39
@lrhn lrhn requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2025 11:39
@github-actions
Copy link

Package publishing

Package Version Status Publish tag (post-merge)
package:bazel_worker 1.1.4 already published at pub.dev
package:benchmark_harness 2.4.0-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:boolean_selector 2.1.2 already published at pub.dev
package:browser_launcher 1.1.3 already published at pub.dev
package:cli_config 0.2.1-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:cli_util 0.5.0-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:clock 1.1.3-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:code_builder 4.11.0 already published at pub.dev
package:coverage 1.15.0 already published at pub.dev
package:csslib 1.0.2 already published at pub.dev
package:extension_discovery 2.1.0 already published at pub.dev
package:file 7.0.2-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:file_testing 3.1.0-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:glob 2.1.3 already published at pub.dev
package:graphs 2.3.3-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:html 0.15.7-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:io 1.1.0-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:json_rpc_2 4.0.0 already published at pub.dev
package:markdown 7.3.1-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:mime 2.0.0 already published at pub.dev
package:oauth2 2.0.4 ready to publish oauth2-v2.0.4
package:package_config 2.3.0-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:pool 1.5.2 already published at pub.dev
package:process 5.0.5 already published at pub.dev
package:pub_semver 2.2.0 already published at pub.dev
package:pubspec_parse 1.5.1-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:source_map_stack_trace 2.1.3-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:source_maps 0.10.14-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:source_span 1.10.1 already published at pub.dev
package:sse 4.1.8 already published at pub.dev
package:stack_trace 1.12.1 already published at pub.dev
package:stream_channel 2.1.4 already published at pub.dev
package:stream_transform 2.1.2-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:string_scanner 1.4.1 already published at pub.dev
package:term_glyph 1.2.3-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:test_reflective_loader 0.4.0 already published at pub.dev
package:timing 1.0.2 already published at pub.dev
package:unified_analytics 8.0.6 ready to publish unified_analytics-v8.0.6
package:watcher 1.1.5-wip WIP (no publish necessary)
package:yaml 3.1.3 already published at pub.dev
package:yaml_edit 2.2.2 already published at pub.dev

Documentation at https://github.com/dart-lang/ecosystem/wiki/Publishing-automation.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of cleaning up the pubspec parser. The changes to avoid multiple iterations, use newer language features like patterns, and extract repeated code into helper functions are all excellent improvements for code quality and performance. I've found a couple of issues. One is a small documentation error and an opportunity for simplification in a new helper function. The other is a potential regression in the _normalizeAuthors function where it no longer deduplicates all authors. My review includes suggestions to address these points. Overall, this is a solid refactoring effort.

Comment on lines 185 to 193
static List<String> _normalizeAuthors(String? author, List<String>? authors) {
final value = <String>{if (author != null) author, ...?authors};
return value.toList();
if (author == null) return authors ?? const [];
return [
author,
if (authors != null)
for (var otherAuthor in authors)
if (author != otherAuthor) otherAuthor,
];
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The new implementation of _normalizeAuthors no longer removes duplicate entries within the authors list itself, and also doesn't remove duplicates if author is null. The previous implementation used a Set, which correctly handled all duplicates. The constructor comment for Pubspec also states that duplicates are eliminated. This change is an unintended regression.

For example, if authors is ['a', 'a'] and author is null, the old implementation would return ['a'], while the new one returns ['a', 'a'].

To preserve the old behavior of removing all duplicates, it's best to use a Set as before.

  static List<String> _normalizeAuthors(String? author, List<String>? authors) {
    final value = <String>{if (author != null) author, ...?authors};
    return value.toList();
  }

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correctly spotted. Is this something we care about?
(There is no test which fails, so clearly not.)

Are we normalizing for our own sake, or for the user's, if they pass in a list with duplicate authors.

And Gemini, you can write that entire body as => [...{?author, ...?authors}];.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I doubt deduplication within authors is an intended feature and I don't think it's likely to come up in practice. I'd be happy with either using this version, or restoring the deduplicating behavior and adding a test. I think you're already handling the important name to dedupe.

Comment on lines +271 to +284
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'uri': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) {
if (value is! Map) {
if (value is String) {
value = {'url': value};
} else {
throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.');
}
}
return value;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This function can be simplified to avoid reassigning the value parameter, which improves readability. Also, the documentation has a small error: it mentions {'uri': value} but the implementation uses {'url': value}. The suggested code fixes both issues.

/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'url': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) {
  if (value is Map) {
    return value;
  }
  if (value is String) {
    return {'url': value};
  }
  throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.');
}

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, that's even better.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW my personal preference is a switch.

Suggested change
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'uri': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) {
if (value is! Map) {
if (value is String) {
value = {'url': value};
} else {
throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.');
}
}
return value;
}
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'url': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) => switch (value) {
Map() => value,
String() => {'url': value},
_ => throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.'),
};

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK. That is even nicer.

@github-actions
Copy link

PR Health

Breaking changes ✔️
Package Change Current Version New Version Needed Version Looking good?
pubspec_parse Non-Breaking 1.5.0 1.5.1-wip 1.5.1 ✔️

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-breaking-check.

Changelog Entry
Package Changed Files
package:pubspec_parse pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/dependency.dart
pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/pubspec.dart
pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/screenshot.dart

Changes to files need to be accounted for in their respective changelogs.

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-changelog-check.

Coverage ⚠️
File Coverage
pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/dependency.dart 💔 71 % ⬇️ 2 %
pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/pubspec.dart 💚 100 % ⬆️ 2 %
pkgs/pubspec_parse/lib/src/screenshot.dart 💚 100 %

This check for test coverage is informational (issues shown here will not fail the PR).

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-coverage-check.

API leaks ✔️

The following packages contain symbols visible in the public API, but not exported by the library. Export these symbols or remove them from your publicly visible API.

Package Leaked API symbol Leaking sources

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-leaking-check.

License Headers ✔️
// Copyright (c) 2025, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
Files
no missing headers

All source files should start with a license header.

Unrelated files missing license headers
Files
pkgs/bazel_worker/benchmark/benchmark.dart
pkgs/benchmark_harness/integration_test/perf_benchmark_test.dart
pkgs/boolean_selector/example/example.dart
pkgs/clock/lib/clock.dart
pkgs/clock/lib/src/clock.dart
pkgs/clock/lib/src/default.dart
pkgs/clock/lib/src/stopwatch.dart
pkgs/clock/lib/src/utils.dart
pkgs/clock/test/clock_test.dart
pkgs/clock/test/default_test.dart
pkgs/clock/test/stopwatch_test.dart
pkgs/clock/test/utils.dart
pkgs/coverage/lib/src/coverage_options.dart
pkgs/html/example/main.dart
pkgs/html/lib/dom.dart
pkgs/html/lib/dom_parsing.dart
pkgs/html/lib/html_escape.dart
pkgs/html/lib/parser.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/constants.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/encoding_parser.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/html_input_stream.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/list_proxy.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/query_selector.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/token.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/tokenizer.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/treebuilder.dart
pkgs/html/lib/src/utils.dart
pkgs/html/test/dom_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/parser_feature_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/parser_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/query_selector_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/selectors/level1_baseline_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/selectors/level1_lib.dart
pkgs/html/test/selectors/selectors.dart
pkgs/html/test/support.dart
pkgs/html/test/tokenizer_test.dart
pkgs/html/test/trie_test.dart
pkgs/html/tool/generate_trie.dart
pkgs/pubspec_parse/test/git_uri_test.dart
pkgs/stack_trace/example/example.dart
pkgs/watcher/test/custom_watcher_factory_test.dart
pkgs/yaml_edit/example/example.dart

This check can be disabled by tagging the PR with skip-license-check.

Comment on lines +271 to +284
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'uri': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) {
if (value is! Map) {
if (value is String) {
value = {'url': value};
} else {
throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.');
}
}
return value;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW my personal preference is a switch.

Suggested change
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'uri': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) {
if (value is! Map) {
if (value is String) {
value = {'url': value};
} else {
throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.');
}
}
return value;
}
/// The `value` if it is a `Map`, or `{'url': value}` if it is a `String`.
///
/// Must be one or the other.
/// The [name] is used as parameter name in the thrown error.
Map _mapOrStringUri(Object? value, String name) => switch (value) {
Map() => value,
String() => {'url': value},
_ => throw ArgumentError.value(value, name, 'Must be a String or a Map.'),
};

Comment on lines 185 to 193
static List<String> _normalizeAuthors(String? author, List<String>? authors) {
final value = <String>{if (author != null) author, ...?authors};
return value.toList();
if (author == null) return authors ?? const [];
return [
author,
if (authors != null)
for (var otherAuthor in authors)
if (author != otherAuthor) otherAuthor,
];
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I doubt deduplication within authors is an intended feature and I don't think it's likely to come up in practice. I'd be happy with either using this version, or restoring the deduplicating behavior and adding a test. I think you're already handling the important name to dedupe.

Comment on lines +22 to +38
String _readString(Map input, String entryName) {
final value = input[entryName];
if (value is String) return value;
if (value == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `$entryName`',
);
}

for (final e in input) {
if (e is! Map) continue;

final description = e['description'];
if (description == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'description',
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `description`',
);
}

if (description is! String) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'description',
'Screenshot',
'`$description` is not a String',
);
}

final path = e['path'];
if (path == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'path',
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `path`',
);
}

if (path is! String) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'path',
'Screenshot',
'`$path` is not a String',
);
}

res.add(Screenshot(description, path));
}
return res;
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'`$value` is not a String',
);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[optional] I like a switch here too.

Suggested change
String _readString(Map input, String entryName) {
final value = input[entryName];
if (value is String) return value;
if (value == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `$entryName`',
);
}
for (final e in input) {
if (e is! Map) continue;
final description = e['description'];
if (description == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'description',
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `description`',
);
}
if (description is! String) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'description',
'Screenshot',
'`$description` is not a String',
);
}
final path = e['path'];
if (path == null) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'path',
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `path`',
);
}
if (path is! String) {
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
e,
'path',
'Screenshot',
'`$path` is not a String',
);
}
res.add(Screenshot(description, path));
}
return res;
throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'`$value` is not a String',
);
String _readString(Map input, String entryName) => switch (input[entryName]) {
final String value => value,
null => throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'Missing required key `$entryName`',
),
final value => throw CheckedFromJsonException(
input,
entryName,
'Screenshot',
'`$value` is not a String',
),
};

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants