Skip to content

WIP: Ensure function materialization properly checks for existing relation #1489

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
QMalcolm wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

WIP: Ensure function materialization properly checks for existing relation #1489

QMalcolm wants to merge 4 commits into from
+174 −3

Conversation

@QMalcolm
Copy link
Contributor

@QMalcolm QMalcolm commented Dec 4, 2025

resolves #1488

Problem

Solution

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes The PR author has signed the CLA label Dec 4, 2025
@cla-bot cla-bot bot temporarily deployed to dbt-redshift December 4, 2025 01:32 Inactive
@QMalcolm QMalcolm deployed to dbt-redshift December 11, 2025 02:47 — with GitHub Actions Active
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cla:yes The PR author has signed the CLA

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Most adapters don't know how to lookup a relation for a function

2 participants

@QMalcolm