Skip to content

Conversation

@sbouchet
Copy link

@sbouchet sbouchet commented Oct 21, 2025

Description of Changes

Update runtime image to Red Hat UBI 9 PHP 8.3 for php laravel sample

Related Issue(s)

fixes eclipse-che/che#23519
fixes eclipse-che/che#23626

Acceptance Criteria

  • Contributing guide

Have you read the devfile registry contributing guide and followed its instructions?

  • Test automation

Does this repository's tests pass with your changes?

  • Documentation

Does any documentation need to be updated with your changes?

  • Check Tools Provider

Have you tested the changes with existing tools, i.e. Odo, Che, Console? (See devfile registry contributing guide on how to test changes)

Tests Performed

Explain what tests you personally ran to ensure the changes are functioning as expected.

How To Test

Instructions for the reviewer on how to test your changes.

Notes To Reviewer

Any notes you would like to include for the reviewer.

@sbouchet sbouchet requested review from a team as code owners October 21, 2025 15:31
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Hi @sbouchet. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sbouchet sbouchet force-pushed the eclipse-che/che/issues/23519 branch from 1b4296d to 3d10910 Compare October 21, 2025 15:37
Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]>
targetPort: 8000
protocol: https
image: quay.io/devfile/composer:2.5.8
image: quay.io/devfile/universal-developer-image:ubi9-latest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the image is going to be changed - maybe it makes sense to create a new version (2.0.2) + add changes to the stack.yaml file
@thepetk could you take a look please

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sbouchet @RomanNikitenko I think a new major version (3.0.0) + bump would be best here imo, since the entire image is changed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Looks good to me label Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ibuziuk, sbouchet
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign johnmcollier for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sbouchet
Copy link
Author

konflux check failling with : User sbouchet is not allowed to trigger CI via pull_request in this repo.

@sbouchet
Copy link
Author

sbouchet commented Nov 12, 2025

the failing test ci/prow/v4.16-registry-test. seems also to be a known issue cc @johnmcollier

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

@sbouchet Try a rebase to fix the Red Hat Konflux / devfile-registry-main-enterprise-contract / devfile-registry-main, should be good now that I've force merged #632, I'll manually run the integration test against my openshift cluster and force merge if everything looks good to get past ci/prow/v4.16-registry-test.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Looks good to me label Nov 13, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@sbouchet
Copy link
Author

also, what about version changes discussed here : #644 (comment)

@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Member

@michael-valdron michael-valdron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sbouchet Run integration tests (bash .ci/openshift_integration.sh) on my cluster against these changes and got passing ✔️

Once you've addressed my comment under @RomanNikitenko's feedback thread I'll sign off.

Screenshot From 2025-11-13 17-58-20 Screenshot From 2025-11-13 17-59-40

Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]>
@michael-valdron
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 17, 2025

@sbouchet: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v4.16-registry-test 1dabae1 link true /test v4.16-registry-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Workspace for the Laravel sample fails at starting Che-Code editor PhpStorm doesn't work with Laravel sample

4 participants