Add T95MAX+ as tested

[mancubus77]

Tested with T95 MAX+
Ethernet ✅
Wifi ✅
HDMI ✅

[mancubus77]

Bluetooth ❌

[devmfc]

Thanks for this. But I don't keep a list with tested boxes, only a list of boxes with a specific DTB for them (including things that are different for each box like vfd display + mapping, reset buttons etc.)

[mancubus77]

No worries
I'm battling with VFD at the moment... Compiled OpenVFD, but no way can crack on layout =(

[devmfc]

My images do have support for various VFD configs and controllers without OpenVFD. Did you try to boot it with as a x96airp3? (that one is based on a tm1628 vfd controller). And otherwise as h96maxx3, this one has an FD655 controller.

[mancubus77]

I tried s905x3_generic_gigabit, but OpenVFD doesn't see a device in /dev
Is it safe to try other boot.config configs on burned image?

[mancubus77]

ark:~#dmesg | grep open
[    4.549964] openvfd: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.

OpenVFD compiled and running as a module (it's not in the default build) for some reason. I had to update OpenVFD it to be compilable on 6.12, as original on GitHub is a bit outdated.

[devmfc]

I think you misunderstood what I was saying ;-). My images indeed do NOT include OpenVFD AND don't have the, for openVFD required DTB nodes.
My images however do have my own TM1628 driver built-in. But also for that driver you do need the box specific DTB nodes. So the box specific DTB's have these nodes. That is why you could try to another S905X3 based box specific DTB. And yes, theoretically that is a bad idea, in practice however I have never had any problems (except a kernel crash or something) trying another DTB for another box.