adds validity check for reference prefixes #391
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Description
It was noticed in the assign entities command that some references with colons in them were causing issues with the prefix field. e.g the reference
DA:20/21=S106:001:20/0284/FULThe assign entities command was treating the
DApart as the prefix so was outputting entities in lookup.csv like so:DA,,,,local-authority:EXE,20/21=S106:001:20/0284/FUL,4609968,,,This PR fixes this by ensuring that reference prefixes belong to a group of 'valid reference prefixes', which is the datasets from the specification
Related Tickets & Documents
QA Instructions, Screenshots, Recordings
Please replace this line with instructions on how to test your changes, a note
on the devices and browsers this has been tested on, as well as any relevant
images for UI changes.
Added/updated tests?
We encourage you to keep the code coverage percentage at 80% and above. Please refer to the Digital Land Testing Guidance for more information.
have not been included