Update react-query.mdx #10452
Merged
Update react-query.mdx #10452
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added ts file ext to match the example. the query is written in the "index.ts" file. wo this the query in the example doesn't get the type correctly and ts doesn't compile correctly
|
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Added ts file ext to the codegen config to match the example in the docs.
In the docs example the query is placed in the "index.ts" file. This update will allow the query get the type correctly and ts will now compile correctly
Related # (issue)
issue
Type of change
Screenshots/Sandbox (if appropriate/relevant):
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Environment:
@graphql-codegen/...:Checklist:
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...