Skip to content

Conversation

gearonixx
Copy link
Contributor

closes #117

Added this rule to the future preset

@igorkamyshev
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution 😇 I'll take a look this week.

Copy link
Member

@igorkamyshev igorkamyshev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add documentation for the rule? All other stuff is great, I'll merge it as soon as the documentation is done.

@gearonixx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added

@igorkamyshev
Copy link
Member

Added

Sorry, as a maintainer, I have to be mean. The current version of documentation does not explain anything. Why does this rule exist? Why is .on bad?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rule: no-on
2 participants