-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
I210 dev [do not merge] #962
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merge in wave calibration for the straight road @AboudyKreidieh
… into datapipeline_dev
… into datapipeline_dev
…) to custom output
Slowdown i210
…) to custom output
Add computation for safety metrics to pipeline
…nto jl-time-bins
reduce time-bins to 10s
count vehicles in domain for leaderboard
Add query to produce max score line in leaderboard
Time-Space Diagram greyed regions
Add accel penalty, stop penalty, mpg reward, and ability to compute reward for any vehicles upstream of you (i.e. make you less greedy and more social)
* New energy class to inventory multiple energy models Co-authored-by: Joy Carpio <[email protected]>
* Add time-space diagram plotting to experiment.py
* prereq dict added to query * prereq checking mechanism implemented, not tested yet * prereq checking tested * change to more flexible filter handling * make safety_rate and safety_max_value floats * ignore nulls in fact_top_scores * fix typo * remove unneeded import * replace uneccessary use of list to set * add queries to pre-bin histogram data * fix the serialization issue with set, convert to list before write as json * fix query * fix query * fixed query bug Co-authored-by: liljonnystyle <[email protected]>
* update tacoma power demand query, meters/Joules -> mpg conversion
* fix some implementation errors in energy models * pull i210_dev and fix flake8
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is meant to help us keep track of the difference between
i210_devandmasterand help us share things that need to be modified in here.I've resolved a good deal of the pep8 and pydocstyle issues, but there are still some that I cannot easily address. Let's try to resolve these:
pep8
pydocstyle
PPOLoss: D101: Missing docstring in public classppo_surrogate_loss: D103: Missing docstring in public functionkl_and_loss_stats: D103: Missing docstring in public functionclip_gradients: D103: Missing docstring in public functionValueNetworkMixin: D101: Missing docstring in public classsetup_config: D103: Missing docstring in public functionsetup_mixins: D103: Missing docstring in public functionKLCoeffMixin: D101: Missing docstring in public classupdate_kl: D102: Missing docstring in public methodvalidate_config: D103: Missing docstring in public functionforward: D102: Missing docstring in public methodcentral_value_function: D102: Missing docstring in public methodvalue_function: D102: Missing docstring in public methodforward_rnn: D102: Missing docstring in public methodget_initial_state: D102: Missing docstring in public methodcentral_value_function: D102: Missing docstring in public methodvalue_function: D102: Missing docstring in public methodcompute_central_vf: D102: Missing docstring in public methodcentralized_critic_postprocessing: D103: Missing docstring in public functionfill_missing: D103: Missing docstring in public functionloss_with_central_critic: D103: Missing docstring in public functionPPOLoss: D101: Missing docstring in public classnew_ppo_surrogate_loss: D103: Missing docstring in public functionKLCoeffMixin: D101: Missing docstring in public classupdate_kl: D102: Missing docstring in public methodsetup_mixins: D103: Missing docstring in public functioncentral_vf_stats: D103: Missing docstring in public functionkl_and_loss_stats: D103: Missing docstring in public function