Skip to content

Conversation

@vallsjm
Copy link

@vallsjm vallsjm commented Jun 18, 2014

This is a new structure suggestion.

Now we have a JSON file with all data, "manifest.json" contain all boxes.

@JonTheNiceGuy
Copy link
Collaborator

We have a similar proposal in #29 by @jney, progressed in #271 by @fgrehm. I think I'd like sign-off from @garethr before we approach either of these two. Given #29 and #271 have some history, I suspect that would be a better approach to follow, but... as I said, I'd like guidance from others before I consider merging. Also, it'd break the other 10 open PRs, so we'd need to back-port any fixes in those.

@vallsjm
Copy link
Author

vallsjm commented Jun 19, 2014

You're right.

In my proposal it is considered important to structure the data a little with a JSON. That would allow more powerful filters, exports, etc...

@JonTheNiceGuy JonTheNiceGuy mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2014
@JonTheNiceGuy
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not going to merge this commit. We already have a new structure to move towards in #29 / #271. Once that has been implemented, maybe we can look to replace the front with Angular, but right now we're not ready to take that step.

Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants