ref: Convert SentryUIDevice to Swift

[noahsmartin]

Fixes #5921

#skip-changelog

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@af7a86c). Learn more about missing BASE report.
⚠️ Report is 23 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #5943   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage        ?   86.749%           
========================================
  Files           ?       424           
  Lines           ?     36724           
  Branches        ?     17367           
========================================
  Hits            ?     31858           
  Misses          ?      4820           
  Partials        ?        46           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
Sources/Sentry/SentryCrashWrapper.m	91.129% <ø> (ø)
Sources/Sentry/SentryDependencyContainer.m	88.425% <100.000%> (ø)
Sources/Sentry/SentryExtraContextProvider.m	84.615% <ø> (ø)
Sources/Sentry/SentrySDKInternal.m	86.885% <ø> (ø)
...rces/Swift/Core/Helper/SentryUIDeviceWrapper.swift	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update af7a86c...8333e1d. Read the comment docs.

[seer-by-sentry]

Seer failed to run.

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1230.41 ms	1256.12 ms	25.71 ms
Size	23.75 KiB	928.88 KiB	905.13 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1fe932f	1231.92 ms	1253.44 ms	21.52 ms
073562b	1232.63 ms	1259.88 ms	27.24 ms
cda95fc	1231.42 ms	1247.18 ms	15.77 ms
8fd192f	1202.10 ms	1220.19 ms	18.09 ms
51b7dd3	1235.06 ms	1258.21 ms	23.15 ms
ebc3a34	1236.24 ms	1261.02 ms	24.78 ms
fd5961e	1210.59 ms	1235.57 ms	24.98 ms
42a95d5	1206.00 ms	1224.26 ms	18.26 ms
ae7be93	1236.24 ms	1258.18 ms	21.94 ms
884b224	1221.11 ms	1255.88 ms	34.77 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1fe932f	23.75 KiB	913.63 KiB	889.88 KiB
073562b	23.75 KiB	927.06 KiB	903.31 KiB
cda95fc	23.75 KiB	912.77 KiB	889.02 KiB
8fd192f	23.74 KiB	872.75 KiB	849.01 KiB
51b7dd3	23.75 KiB	913.26 KiB	889.52 KiB
ebc3a34	23.75 KiB	919.91 KiB	896.16 KiB
fd5961e	23.74 KiB	874.07 KiB	850.32 KiB
42a95d5	23.75 KiB	906.08 KiB	882.33 KiB
ae7be93	23.75 KiB	879.24 KiB	855.49 KiB
884b224	23.75 KiB	879.55 KiB	855.80 KiB

Previous results on branch: sentryUIDeviceWrapperSwift

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
4da8e49	1209.78 ms	1234.24 ms	24.47 ms
3da0264	1195.74 ms	1215.08 ms	19.34 ms
7dd2b6f	1209.50 ms	1228.82 ms	19.32 ms
44b1293	1208.92 ms	1263.34 ms	54.42 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
4da8e49	23.75 KiB	921.01 KiB	897.26 KiB
3da0264	23.75 KiB	922.10 KiB	898.35 KiB
7dd2b6f	23.75 KiB	920.80 KiB	897.05 KiB
44b1293	23.75 KiB	922.10 KiB	898.35 KiB

[philipphofmann]

I would really prefer adding some tests when changing this. So basically some tests validating the old functionality. They need to be green and stay green once the class is converted to Swift. I know it's just a wrapper class, but it's so easy to introduce major bugs with such refactorings.

[noahsmartin]

Updated and added 2 new tests for this

[philprime]

LGTM, but it might be worth to add the additional two test cases to get the code coverage of SentryUIDeviceWrapper.swift to 100%