-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Feat: handle new Events from a tx's response #194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
…o type Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, do not add more functionality to the old query and subscription methods: blocks() and transactions(). They are going to be deprecated and removed in following releases.
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Thompson <[email protected]>
Hi @ajnavarro . This PR adds support for GnoEvent with the new |
Hi @jefft0 ! If we made a change on the Gno side that caused the transaction query endpoint to break, it is fine, but it shouldn't be a problem caused by us when modifying the indexer. |
I confirm that this PR doesn't change the behavior of querying a
Here is the response in this PR (running with gno.land in the master branch).
Here is the response in the main branch which is the same for
|
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
This PR:
StorageDepositEvent
andStorageUnlockEvent
(after chore: In gnokey, show storage deposit fee gno#4630)Func
field and filter in GnoEvent (not present in the gno code base)Usage
This is an example of a graphql request to get events from the transaction response: