-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
fix:Add disallowTransferToParent check to parent agent transfer condition #393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix:Add disallowTransferToParent check to parent agent transfer condition #393
Conversation
Only allow transfer to parent agent when both conditions are met: - Parent agent exists (agent.parentAgent() != null) - Transfer to parent is allowed (!agent.disallowTransferToParent()) This prevents unwanted transfers to parent agents when explicitly disabled. Aligns Java implementation with Python version for consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @JinXingJX, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refines the agent transfer mechanism by introducing a new condition that prevents an agent from transferring to its parent if such a transfer is explicitly disallowed. This change ensures that transfers only occur when both a parent agent exists and the transfer is permitted, enhancing consistency and control over agent interactions.
Highlights
- Agent Transfer Logic Update: The condition for allowing an agent to transfer to its parent has been updated to include a check for
!agent.disallowTransferToParent()
. This prevents transfers to parent agents when they are explicitly disabled, aligning the Java implementation with its Python counterpart.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a check for disallowTransferToParent
when constructing the LLM prompt, ensuring that instructions to transfer to a parent agent are only provided when it's allowed. This change correctly aligns the prompt generation logic with the agent transfer target selection logic, preventing potentially confusing instructions for the LLM. I have added one comment pointing out a related, pre-existing issue in the prompt text that could be addressed to further improve clarity.
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ private String buildTargetAgentsInstructions(LlmAgent agent, List<BaseAgent> tra | |||
"If another agent is better for answering the question according to its description, call" | |||
+ " `transferToAgent` function to transfer the question to that agent. When" | |||
+ " transferring, do not generate any text other than the function call.\n"); | |||
if (agent.parentAgent() != null) { | |||
if (agent.parentAgent() != null && !agent.disallowTransferToParent()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The added condition !agent.disallowTransferToParent()
is correct and aligns the behavior with getTransferTargets
.
On a related note, the instruction generated within this if
block (on lines 94-96) seems to contain a contradiction. It says, ...If you don't have parent agent, try answer by yourself
, but this code block is only entered if agent.parentAgent() != null
. This might confuse the LLM.
Since you are working in this area, you might consider removing the contradictory part of the instruction to improve prompt clarity. For example:
sb.append(
".If neither the other agents nor you are best for answering the question according to"
+ " the descriptions, transfer to your parent agent.\n");
8a507a4
to
32500f4
Compare
Only allow transfer to parent agent when both conditions are met:
This prevents unwanted transfers to parent agents when explicitly disabled. Aligns Java implementation with Python version for consistency.