-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 117
Migrate controller e2e tests to use Controller CLI #1461
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… into expose-apis
- marks CLI tool as Python package - restructure files to recommended packaging standard
- Updates documentation and dependencies
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1461 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 46.66% 46.62% -0.04%
Complexity 676 676
============================================
Files 90 90
Lines 5874 5874
Branches 814 814
============================================
- Hits 2741 2739 -2
- Misses 2828 2830 +2
Partials 305 305 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
1 similar comment
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
1 similar comment
|
/gcbrun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes look fine to me, I have been just waiting for a green build which I don't think I ever saw on this PR yet, did you @ndegwamartin ?
|
So @ndegwamartin I think the reason that we never got a green e2e for this is probably because there is a legitimate failure (and not just flaky issue). Here is a relevant error log from the latest e2e run: And then it causes the incremental step to fail at counting number of resources (probably because the incremental step is never run). |
|
/gcbrun |
2 similar comments
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
- Refactors Status and Run methods to use exact typing - Passes runMode parameter via params for run method
|
/gcbrun |
|
/gcbrun |
Description of what I changed
resolves #1430
E2E test
TESTED:
Please replace this with a description of how you tested your PR beyond the
automated e2e/unit tests.
Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)
I have read and will follow the
review process.
I am familiar with Google Style Guides for the language I have coded in.
No? Please take some time and review
Java and
Python style guides.
My IDE is configured to follow the Google
code styles.
No? Unsure? ->
configure your IDE.
I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored existing
code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)
I ran
mvn clean packageright before creating this pull request andadded all formatting changes to my commit.
If I made any Python code changes, I ran
black .andpylint .rightbefore creating this pull request and added all formatting changes to my
commit.
All new and existing tests passed.
My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.
No? Unsure? -> execute command
git pull --rebase upstream master