Skip to content

Conversation

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of what I changed

resolves #1430

E2E test

TESTED:

Please replace this with a description of how you tested your PR beyond the
automated e2e/unit tests.

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • I have read and will follow the
    review process.

  • I am familiar with Google Style Guides for the language I have coded in.

    No? Please take some time and review
    Java and
    Python style guides.

  • My IDE is configured to follow the Google
    code styles.

    No? Unsure? ->
    configure your IDE.

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored existing
    code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

  • If I made any Python code changes, I ran black . and pylint . right
    before creating this pull request and added all formatting changes to my
    commit.

  • All new and existing tests passed.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

ndegwamartin and others added 30 commits August 6, 2025 19:55
- marks CLI tool as Python package
- restructure files to recommended packaging standard
 - Updates documentation and dependencies
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 16, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 46.62%. Comparing base (a70dab1) to head (cc3968c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1461      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     46.66%   46.62%   -0.04%     
  Complexity      676      676              
============================================
  Files            90       90              
  Lines          5874     5874              
  Branches        814      814              
============================================
- Hits           2741     2739       -2     
- Misses         2828     2830       +2     
  Partials        305      305              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ndegwamartin ndegwamartin mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2025
7 tasks
@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin ndegwamartin marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 10:51
@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

1 similar comment
@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

1 similar comment
@bashir2
Copy link
Collaborator

bashir2 commented Oct 14, 2025

/gcbrun

Copy link
Collaborator

@bashir2 bashir2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look fine to me, I have been just waiting for a green build which I don't think I ever saw on this PR yet, did you @ndegwamartin ?

@bashir2
Copy link
Collaborator

bashir2 commented Oct 21, 2025

So @ndegwamartin I think the reason that we never got a green e2e for this is probably because there is a legitimate failure (and not just flaky issue). Here is a relevant error log from the latest e2e run:

ERROR:root:An error occurred during the request: 500 Server Error:  for url: http://pipeline-controller:8080/run?runMode=INCREMENTAL
Command: run 
Request url: http://pipeline-controller:8080
Response:
null
parse error: Unfinished JSON term at EOF at line 6, column 0

And then it causes the incremental step to fail at counting number of resources (probably because the incremental step is never run).

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

2 similar comments
@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

- Refactors Status and Run methods to use exact typing
- Passes runMode parameter via params for run method
@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

@ndegwamartin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gcbrun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Set up end to end testing configuration and documentation for the CLI Python subproject

3 participants