Skip to content

Conversation

Tyler887
Copy link

Only the copyright notice does not provide an easy way for licensee to know the license. Copying the entire license would let licensee properly know the license.

@warsaw
Copy link
Collaborator

warsaw commented Apr 12, 2022

Thanks for the contribution @Tyler887 . Can you explain why this is useful for you? I generally always include just the short license blurb in my packages and haven't had any complaints yet.

same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.

Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this at least include the years 2021-2022 and both Grant's and my name?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It says include it at the top of every source file. I have enabled editing files in this pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants