Skip to content

Conversation

@MEGATREX4
Copy link

I think it is much more accurate than the one proposed by the other gentleman.

I think it is much more accurate than the one proposed by the other gentleman.
Copy link

@MartianDill MartianDill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some possible improvements. Also you should update your pull request and send it to newer version instead of 1.18 (or both at the same time)

MEGATREX4 added 2 commits May 4, 2023 00:20
updated translation
@MEGATREX4
Copy link
Author

Added some possible improvements. Also you should update your pull request and send it to newer version instead of 1.18 (or both at the same time)

I'm already using version 1.19

Copy link

@MartianDill MartianDill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM:thumbsup:

@MartianDill
Copy link

MartianDill commented May 4, 2023

Added some possible improvements. Also you should update your pull request and send it to newer version instead of 1.18 (or both at the same time)

I'm already using version 1.19

ok, but this Pull Request opened for 1.18 branch, while active is 1.19 branch
I think you should create a new Pull Request for the active branch (maybe with mentioning this PL #1064) so the author will see it and merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants