Skip to content

Conversation

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

Revert support for GroupAccessToken credentials

Fixes issue #528

Also fixes JENKINS-76331

A better solution is in pull request:

This is an alternative that I hope to eventually reject in favor of the better solution.

Testing done

  • Confirmed that 2.734.x works as expected in my installation.

Testing to do

  • Confirm that incremental build works well in Jenkins plugin BOM
  • Interactive testing of the incremental build

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed

@jmini
Copy link
Contributor

jmini commented Dec 12, 2025

We have always been using group token to connect Jenkins with our Gitlab...
A group token is generated in GitLab.
Indeed this might not be configured as a group token in Jenkins (I need to investigate what we did couple of years ago)

We gave this version 740.va_b_854965002e taken from hhttps://github.com//pull/531/checks?check_run_id=57854347442 a try, and this works for us. 👍

@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have always been using group token to connect Jenkins with our Gitlab... A group token is generated in GitLab. Indeed this might not be configured as a group token in Jenkins (I need to investigate what we did couple of years ago)

We gave this version 740.va_b_854965002e taken from hhttps://github.com//pull/531/checks?check_run_id=57854347442 a try, and this works for us. 👍

Thanks very, very much for trying the incremental build from the pull request. It may be that I need to phrase the title of the pull request more clearly for the changelog. This pull request removes the features that were added in pull request:

It adds a signature that attempts to retain at least one of the API changes that was added in that pull request, without including the changes that seem to have caused the bug:

I am still hopeful that we can discard this pull request and instead use the pull request:

That pull request needs more testing. Can you test it to confirm that it also resolves the issues for you?

@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

User not found / Project Not Found - exception when upgrading gitlab-branch-source from 734 to 736.

2 participants