add styleguide for GCA code reviews

[divyashreepathihalli]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

[abheesht17]

Thanks! Quick review

[abheesht17]

Does GCA not read the repo at all, which is why we have to provide examples here?

[divyashreepathihalli]

I am not sure - this is how they have provided their examples - https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/customize-gemini-behavior-github

[gemini-code-assist]

That's a great question, @abheesht17! To clarify, I do analyze the code within the repository. However, providing explicit examples within a style guide like this is incredibly valuable for several reasons:

1. Clarity and Precision: Examples help to unambiguously define the expected patterns and conventions, especially for nuanced or project-specific rules that might not be immediately obvious from general best practices.
2. Consistency: They ensure that I, and any human reviewer, apply the rules consistently across the codebase.
3. Customization: As @divyashreepathihalli pointed out with the link to the documentation, these examples are crucial for customizing my behavior. They serve as direct instructions on how to interpret and apply the style guide's principles to your specific project.

So, while I can read the repo, these examples act as a precise blueprint for how you want me to conduct reviews according to your team's standards.

[divyashreepathihalli]

oh haha!!

[abheesht17]

Thanks!