-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 849
Support Node-Local Shared Cache Volume Access #2726
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Code Coverage Diff
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Signed-off-by: Eddie Torres <[email protected]>
ceeefcc to
7f62f48
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-e2e-single-az |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
Introduces a node-local static provisioning mode that enables a single cluster-wide PV/PVC to mount pre-attached, node-specific EBS volumes. When pods reference this PVC, each node independently mounts its own local EBS device and all pods on that node share the mount. This is useful for node-local caching scenarios where each node has a dedicated EBS volume already attached.
The feature is enabled via the
--enable-node-local-volumesflag and uses a speciallocal-ebs://volume handle prefix to identify node-local volumes. The controller resolves the actual volume ID from the device name on each node to supportReadWriteManyaccess mode.closes #2552
How was this change tested?
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?