Skip to content

Conversation

hakman
Copy link
Member

@hakman hakman commented Aug 12, 2025

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. area/addons labels Aug 12, 2025
@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Aug 12, 2025

/override pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k132-ko132-to-klatest-kolatest-many-addons

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hakman: Overrode contexts on behalf of hakman: pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k132-ko132-to-klatest-kolatest-many-addons

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k132-ko132-to-klatest-kolatest-many-addons

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jim-barber-he
Copy link
Contributor

I just hit this on a test cluster where all its nodes are in a single availability zone, so only one of the 3 coredns pods would start.

Rather than removing the constraint, would it be better to keep it and just set whenUnsatisfiable: ScheduleAnyway?
That way where multiple zones are available it will still try to spread the pods across them, but not fail if it doesn't have that option?

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Aug 12, 2025

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2025
@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

The downside of ScheduleAnyway is that if there is room on an existing node in an undesired zone, k8s will schedule it there rather than keep it in Pending for your autoscaler to launch a new node in the desired zone.

Some users may find this acceptable while others may not.

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

This has come up a few times, right, with various approaches proposed? I'm in favor of getting a fix in...

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 29, 2025
@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Aug 29, 2025

Partially reverting #17472
/cc @ameukam @rifelpet

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Aug 29, 2025

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 29, 2025
@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Aug 29, 2025

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 29, 2025
@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Aug 29, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hakman: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k133-ko133-to-klatest-kolatest-many-addons 4eeb347 link false /test pull-kops-e2e-aws-upgrade-k133-ko133-to-klatest-kolatest-many-addons

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 72d999e into kubernetes:master Aug 29, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@hakman hakman deleted the fix-coredns branch August 29, 2025 08:00
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
…-upstream-release-1.33

Automated cherry pick of #17554: coredns: Relax zonal topologySpreadConstraints
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants