DRA: core update for 1.34 #51483

pohly · 2025-07-02T16:45:25Z

Description

This needs to reflect recent changes, new content in the KEP, and last but not least the GA graduation (if we get that far).

Issue

Fixes: kubernetes/kubernetes#131877
kubernetes/enhancements#4381

netlify · 2025-07-02T16:45:32Z

👷 Deploy Preview for kubernetes-io-vnext-staging processing.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	`36162b1`
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-vnext-staging/deploys/6887dc8d3e0f4d0008feb1a3

netlify · 2025-07-02T16:54:51Z

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	`36162b1`
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/6887dc8d2d1c120008fc8999
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-51483--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

lmktfy · 2025-07-02T19:41:59Z

I suggest you mark this as a draft @pohly

pohly · 2025-07-24T09:35:55Z

/hold

kubernetes/kubernetes#132706 needs to be merged before the docs update.

pohly · 2025-07-24T16:44:15Z

/hold cancel

This is ready for review and merging.

pohly · 2025-07-24T16:45:39Z

/assign @nojnhuh

/cc @lauralorenz @shannonxtreme

nojnhuh · 2025-07-24T17:27:40Z

content/en/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-resources/allocate-devices-dra.md

Not related to these changes AFAICT, but the deploy preview doesn't show the "Assign Devices to Pods and Containers" section at /docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/ like kubernetes.io does. Running the website locally with these changes I still see it though.

I'm slightly more inclined to trust the local environment than the automatic preview, especially since I don't see any changes here that seem likely to have broken that, but something to look out for.

nojnhuh · 2025-07-24T17:40:09Z

content/en/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-resources/set-up-dra-cluster.md

+
 Try the following troubleshooting steps:

-1. Ensure that the `kube-scheduler` component has the `DynamicResourceAllocation`


Is it worth preserving troubleshooting steps regarding the feature gate in some form to say "make sure the feature gate is not disabled"?

I added second bullet point for the feature gate. It does not exactly fit here because the section just checks for the presence of the API group, so I had to mention potential failure modes that could occur later on.

Alternatively this could go into the user-facing allocate-devices-dra.md, but users have no way of checking feature gates.

nojnhuh

/lgtm

k8s-ci-robot · 2025-07-26T18:01:03Z

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: dcc376a693affc860e4db897914813036c61f72a

lmktfy

/lgtm
/approve

/hold

You've the option to either:

merge as is (/unhold)
incorporate feedback and ask for another LGTM
Any contributor from SIG Docs or any contributor associated with WG Device Management is welcome to add that follow-up LGTM, and anyone is welcome to unhold if @pohly makes a change that dismisses this LGTM

lmktfy · 2025-07-26T19:09:33Z

content/en/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-resources/allocate-devices-dra.md

Not covered in this PR (and doesn't block a merge), but see how the paragraph starting at line 80 can render.

Graphic designers may experience mental anguish on seeing this.

content/en/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-resources/set-up-dra-cluster.md

The feature gate and API examples get updated. Enabling it is now simpler, changes are only needed for backward compatibility. One particular troubleshooting step fits into the existing user-facing "allocate-devices-dra.md". Admin-facing troubleshooting and documentation of metrics which might be of interest can follow separately.

pohly · 2025-07-28T20:25:42Z

I applied the suggested changes, someone please LGTM again.

/hold cancel

See #51483 (review)

nojnhuh

/lgtm

k8s-ci-robot · 2025-07-28T20:40:35Z

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: bbbd54b96d2ca464d02d9110f4412d5c5937ea29

k8s-ci-robot · 2025-07-28T20:40:35Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lmktfy, nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~content/en/OWNERS~~ [lmktfy]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

nojnhuh · 2025-07-28T22:12:45Z

@pohly Can we take this PR out of draft?

k8s-ci-robot added this to the 1.34 milestone Jul 2, 2025

k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 2, 2025

k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Jul 2, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested review from klueska and tengqm July 2, 2025 16:45

k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 2, 2025

pohly mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2025

DRA: structured parameters kubernetes/enhancements#4381

Open

37 tasks

pohly marked this pull request as draft July 3, 2025 06:00

k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 3, 2025

k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 17, 2025

pohly force-pushed the dra-1.34 branch from 9941168 to 838aed3 Compare July 24, 2025 09:33

k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 24, 2025

pohly marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2025 09:35

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 24, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested a review from nate-double-u July 24, 2025 09:35

k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 24, 2025

pohly mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2025

DRA: failed to create pod: "must specify one of: resourceClaimName, resourceClaimTemplateName" kubernetes/kubernetes#131877

Closed

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 24, 2025

k8s-ci-robot assigned nojnhuh Jul 24, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested review from lauralorenz and shannonxtreme July 24, 2025 16:45

nojnhuh reviewed Jul 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

pohly force-pushed the dra-1.34 branch from 838aed3 to 73eabf6 Compare July 25, 2025 18:44

nojnhuh approved these changes Jul 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 26, 2025

lmktfy approved these changes Jul 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 26, 2025

k8s-ci-robot assigned lmktfy Jul 26, 2025

k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 26, 2025

pohly marked this pull request as draft July 28, 2025 20:20

k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jul 28, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested review from lmktfy and nojnhuh July 28, 2025 20:23

pohly force-pushed the dra-1.34 branch from 1b2888a to 36162b1 Compare July 28, 2025 20:24

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 28, 2025

nojnhuh approved these changes Jul 28, 2025

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2025

pohly marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2025 09:04

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 30, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested a review from reylejano July 30, 2025 09:04

k8s-ci-robot merged commit 61b4928 into kubernetes:dev-1.34 Jul 30, 2025
6 checks passed

wendy-ha18 mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2025

DRA version description on docs missing GA promotion #52087

Closed


		Try the following troubleshooting steps:

		1. Ensure that the `kube-scheduler` component has the `DynamicResourceAllocation`

DRA: core update for 1.34 #51483

DRA: core update for 1.34 #51483

Uh oh!

Conversation

pohly commented Jul 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Issue

Uh oh!

netlify bot commented Jul 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

👷 Deploy Preview for kubernetes-io-vnext-staging processing.

Uh oh!

netlify bot commented Jul 2, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Uh oh!

lmktfy commented Jul 2, 2025

Uh oh!

pohly commented Jul 24, 2025

Uh oh!

pohly commented Jul 24, 2025

Uh oh!

pohly commented Jul 24, 2025

Uh oh!

nojnhuh Jul 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nojnhuh Jul 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pohly Jul 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nojnhuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 26, 2025

Uh oh!

lmktfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lmktfy Jul 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pohly commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

nojnhuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

nojnhuh commented Jul 28, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pohly commented Jul 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

netlify bot commented Jul 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

netlify bot commented Jul 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading