Skip to content

Conversation

@ascend-direct-dev
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Type of Change

  • Types
    • Bug fix
    • New feature
      • Transfer Engine
      • Mooncake Store
      • Mooncake EP
      • Integration
      • P2P Store
      • Python Wheel
    • Breaking change
    • CI/CD
    • Documentation update
    • Other

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have updated the documentation.
  • I have added tests to prove my changes are effective.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @ascend-direct-dev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the observability of the data transfer process by integrating additional informational log statements at critical stages. These new logs will provide clearer insights into when transfer batches are submitted, queued, and executed, which will be invaluable for debugging and monitoring the flow of data within the system.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Logging for Transfer Submission: Added an informational log message in mooncake-store/src/transfer_task.cpp to indicate when a transfer batch is being submitted, including the batch ID and the process ID.
  • Improved Logging for Transfer Engine Queueing: Introduced a log message in mooncake-transfer-engine/src/transport/ascend_transport/ascend_direct_transport/ascend_direct_transport.cpp when a batch ID is pushed to the slice queue, aiding in tracking transfer progress.
  • Detailed Logging for Transfer Connection and Execution: Added two new log messages within mooncake-transfer-engine/src/transport/ascend_transport/ascend_direct_transport/ascend_direct_transport.cpp: one at the start of the connectAndTransfer function to show the target engine and process ID, and another just before calling TransferSync to mark the beginning of the synchronous transfer operation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds several LOG(INFO) statements across different files. Based on the PR title 'add test log' and the content of the logs (e.g., including process IDs), these appear to be for debugging purposes. While useful for development, LOG(INFO) statements can create a lot of noise in production logs. It is recommended to convert these to verbose logs using VLOG(1), which is already in use in the codebase. This allows the logs to be enabled for debugging without affecting production environments.

Comment on lines +574 to +575
LOG(INFO) << "Submitting transfer batch " << batch_id
<< " pid:" << getpid();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This LOG(INFO) statement appears to be for debugging, as suggested by the PR title. To avoid cluttering production logs, it's better to use verbose logging. Consider changing this to VLOG(1), which allows these logs to be enabled only when needed for debugging.

Suggested change
LOG(INFO) << "Submitting transfer batch " << batch_id
<< " pid:" << getpid();
VLOG(1) << "Submitting transfer batch " << batch_id
<< " pid:" << getpid();

slice_list.push_back(slice);
}

LOG(INFO) << "Push batch id:" << batch_id << " to slice queue";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This LOG(INFO) statement seems to be for debugging purposes. To prevent noisy logs in production, please use a verbose logging level like VLOG(1). This will allow you to enable these logs on demand for debugging without affecting the default log output.

Suggested change
LOG(INFO) << "Push batch id:" << batch_id << " to slice queue";
VLOG(1) << "Push batch id:" << batch_id << " to slice queue";

Comment on lines +609 to +610
LOG(INFO) << "Start transfer to " << target_adxl_engine_name
<< " pid:" << getpid();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The inclusion of the process ID (pid) in this log message strongly suggests it's intended for debugging. LOG(INFO) should be reserved for information that is generally useful. For debugging-specific logs, please use VLOG(1) to keep production logs clean.

Suggested change
LOG(INFO) << "Start transfer to " << target_adxl_engine_name
<< " pid:" << getpid();
VLOG(1) << "Start transfer to " << target_adxl_engine_name
<< " pid:" << getpid();

op_desc.len = slice->length;
op_descs.emplace_back(op_desc);
}
LOG(INFO) << "Start call TransferSync to " << target_adxl_engine_name;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This LOG(INFO) statement appears to be a debug log for tracing execution flow. It's recommended to use verbose logging, such as VLOG(1), for this kind of message. This helps in keeping the production logs concise and focused on important events.

Suggested change
LOG(INFO) << "Start call TransferSync to " << target_adxl_engine_name;
VLOG(1) << "Start call TransferSync to " << target_adxl_engine_name;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant