Skip to content

Conversation

Wooder
Copy link

@Wooder Wooder commented Jan 20, 2018

As discussed in #69 in some cases
access to the raw json data is needed. Therefore „claims“ should be
exposed.

As described in issue
kylef#69 in some cases
access to the raw json data is needed. Therefore „claims“ should be
exposed.
@Wooder Wooder mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2018
@chadmoone
Copy link

I totally missed this before creating #106, which is a slightly different approach to the same thing. Personally, I don't see why set should be internal, though my primary concern is also with the ability to read it publicly.

@kylef Do you have a preference? Any chance we can get one of these in?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants