-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
MC: Encode FT_Align in fragment's variable-size tail #149030
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
MaskRay
merged 6 commits into
main
from
users/MaskRay/spr/mc-restructure-mcalignfragment-as-a-fixed-part-an-alignment-tail
Jul 20, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eb8dc78
[𝘀𝗽𝗿] initial version
MaskRay acd5482
fix wasm. rebase on .reloc 3cb0c7f45b97802ddc13a15560fbbca2efb75326
MaskRay 10b5160
rebase
MaskRay 6b7b664
rebase
MaskRay 6b618b1
rebase
MaskRay e1346d3
rebase after fragment-in-BSS check 5ee34ff1e5cc952116f0da943ddaeb1a71…
MaskRay File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assert that STI didn't change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately we cannot.
The STI is not useful for FT_Data fragments.
emitInstToData
has a STI, and it passes the STI to the created FT_Data fragment, the fragment's STI is not used.https://reviews.llvm.org/D44928 added
getSubtargetInfo
toMCEncodedFragmentWithFixups
(now replaced by MCFragment). I think we can removeSTI
from emitInstToData first (check-llvm-mc passes).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created #149471