Add __brand to make empty interfaces nominal

[saschanaz]

Because who have thought that there are so many existing empty interfaces which are also used as parameter types. And thus this follows the pattern in https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#example/nominal-typing.

Preparing for #2074.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR!

This section of the codebase is owned by @saschanaz - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged.

[saschanaz]

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-DOM-lib-generator/pull/1246/files#r881972594 suggested emitting a class with a private member. While I'm all for emitting classes (yes please) but a private member would only raise the possibility to clash with other libraries. Introducing a public member would allow other libraries to match the brand.

[Bashamega]

Mostly looks good.

[jakebailey]

These will end up being in completions and so on (I see people do like " brand": any to derank them); is this a pattern taken from the existing trusted types definition or something?

I don't know that we actually use type branding in any of the existing lib.d.ts files, so this would be a new thing I think.

[saschanaz]

These will end up being in completions and so on

This is only for empty interfaces so I think that part is less a problem, although putting a space is an interesting solution.

is this a pattern taken from the existing trusted types definition or something?

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#example/nominal-typing

As you saw in #2074 the most popular one (I don't think there's any other comparable library?) uses private brand: true 😞

[jakebailey]

One thing I think we're going to have to try is to port this code into the main TS repo and run the extended suite.