Skip to content

Conversation

@feliperodri
Copy link
Contributor

RFC describing the support for existential and universal quantifiers in Kani.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@feliperodri feliperodri added this to the Function Contracts milestone Jun 7, 2024
@feliperodri feliperodri self-assigned this Jun 7, 2024
@feliperodri feliperodri requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2024 21:46
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Felipe. This is a very well-written RFC!

Copy link
Member

@tautschnig tautschnig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok from my point of view, except I'd prefer a somewhat more precise language.

@feliperodri feliperodri added the T-RFC Label RFC PRs and Issues label Jun 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@qinheping qinheping left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe R. Monteiro <[email protected]>
@feliperodri feliperodri enabled auto-merge (squash) June 27, 2024 06:48
@feliperodri feliperodri merged commit 997c95c into model-checking:main Jun 27, 2024
@feliperodri feliperodri deleted the quantifiers-rfc branch June 27, 2024 16:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

T-RFC Label RFC PRs and Issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants