Skip to content

Conversation

@tastelikefeet
Copy link
Collaborator

PR type

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature
  • Document Updates
  • More Models or Datasets Support

PR information

Write the detail information belongs to this PR.

Experiment results

Paste your experiment result here(if needed).

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tastelikefeet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug within the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) trainer. It ensures that the input data is properly preprocessed and prepared for the model's prediction step, which was previously overlooked. This fix prevents potential errors or incorrect behavior during evaluation or inference by guaranteeing that inputs are in the correct format and on the right device before being processed by the underlying model.

Highlights

  • DPO Trainer Bug Fix: Ensures that input tensors are correctly prepared (e.g., moved to the appropriate device) before being passed to the parent class's prediction_step method in the DPOTrainer.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@tastelikefeet tastelikefeet merged commit 5d8814a into modelscope:main Dec 15, 2025
3 checks passed
@tastelikefeet tastelikefeet deleted the fix/1215-1 branch December 15, 2025 12:41
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue with DPO and sequence parallelism. The change involves adding a call to _prepare_inputs within the prediction_step of the DPOTrainer. However, this change introduces a redundant call, as _prepare_inputs is already called by the prediction_loop before prediction_step. This can lead to inefficiency and potential issues. I've suggested removing the redundant call and recommended investigating the root cause if the original implementation was indeed buggy.

Jintao-Huang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
Co-authored-by: tastelikefeet <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants