Skip to content

Conversation

htranho
Copy link
Contributor

@htranho htranho commented Oct 2, 2025

Overview

What is the feature?

Use only one uuid function in the application. In the vite config we should only use the polyfills that we actually need.

What is the Solution?

Replace crypto call to get uuid by using uuid v4. Update vite config.

What areas of the application does this impact?

Where uuid is generated.

Testing

Reproduction steps

Attachments

Checklist

  • I have added automated tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings

@htranho htranho marked this pull request as draft October 2, 2025 22:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.12%. Comparing base (5664b80) to head (9edae3e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.13%   98.12%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         422      422              
  Lines        6812     6812              
  Branches     1452     1450       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         6685     6684       -1     
- Misses        126      127       +1     
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@eudoroolivares2016 eudoroolivares2016 marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2025 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants