Skip to content

8361207: Build native Windows ARM64 MSI packages #26093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

infeo
Copy link

@infeo infeo commented Jul 2, 2025

Add support for native ARM64 Windows MSI pacakges to jpackage.

For some reasoning and more info, check out the ticket on JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8361207.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Error

 ⚠️ OCA signatory status must be verified

Issue

  • JDK-8361207: Build native Windows ARM64 MSI packages (Enhancement - P4)(⚠️ The fixVersion in this issue is [27] but the fixVersion in .jcheck/conf is 26, a new backport will be created when this pr is integrated.)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26093/head:pull/26093
$ git checkout pull/26093

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26093
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26093/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26093

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26093

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26093.diff

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Jul 2, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Hi @infeo, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user infeo" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 2, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@infeo
Copy link
Author

infeo commented Jul 2, 2025

/covered

This contribution is made on behalf of the Skymatic GmbH.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@infeo The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Jul 2, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@infeo infeo changed the title 8361207: Add support to build native Windows ARM64 MSI packages 8361207: Build native Windows ARM64 MSI packages Jul 2, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 30, 2025

@infeo This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@infeo
Copy link
Author

infeo commented Jul 30, 2025

/touch

@alexeysemenyukoracle can i speed up the OCA verification?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 30, 2025

@infeo The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset.

@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

I just brought your case to the attention of OCA verification team. Hopefully, this will speed up the process.

Comment on lines +148 to +166
enum Arch {
X64,
X86,
AARCH64,
OTHER;
}

static Arch getArch() {
if (Architecture.isX64()) {
return Arch.X64;
} else if (Architecture.isX86()) {
return Arch.X86;
} else if (Architecture.isAARCH64()) {
return Arch.AARCH64;
} else {
return Arch.OTHER;
}
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isn't this enum definition redundant? Why not use Architecture.current() in WixPipeline's switch expressions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants