Skip to content

8361638: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.catchingAll doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException if an existing catch block catches all exceptions #26372

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented Jul 17, 2025

The detection of catch builder arguments is not working for catch-all blocks. Update this to track CP indices including 0 so we can more easily validate the incoming ClassDesc are all non-primitive and there is no duplicate.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires a CSR request matching fixVersion 26 to be approved (needs to be created)

Issue

  • JDK-8361638: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.catchingAll doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException if an existing catch block catches all exceptions (Bug - P3)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26372/head:pull/26372
$ git checkout pull/26372

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26372
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26372/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26372

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26372

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26372.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

liach added 2 commits July 17, 2025 11:45
…legalArgumentException if an existing catch block catches all exceptions
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 17, 2025

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 17, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 17, 2025

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Webrevs

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Jul 23, 2025

/csr

This will update to remove the IAE clauses and behavior, which requires a CSR.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jul 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@liach has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@liach please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8361638 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant