Skip to content

8363889: Update sun.print.PrintJob2D to use Disposer #26432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

prrace
Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace commented Jul 22, 2025

As laid out in the JBS issue, this updates the java.awt.PrintJob implementation to use a delegate which can be disposed instead of relying on finalize().

PrintJob.finalize() is not being removed, and won't be removed until there is a more definite plan for completely removing the finalize() mechanism.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8363889: Update sun.print.PrintJob2D to use Disposer (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26432/head:pull/26432
$ git checkout pull/26432

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26432
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26432/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26432

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26432

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26432.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8363889: Update sun.print.PrintJob2D to use Disposer

Reviewed-by: azvegint, psadhukhan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 141 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8363889 8363889: Update sun.print.PrintJob2D to use Disposer Jul 22, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@prrace The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Webrevs

* graphics from the queue when the app asks for a graphics.
*/
graphicsToBeDrawn.append( (Graphics2D) graphics);
private static class PrintJobDisposerRecord implements DisposerRecord {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we also make it a final class?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see that it matters.

@@ -28,47 +28,14 @@
import java.awt.Dimension;
import java.awt.Frame;
import java.awt.Graphics;
import java.awt.Graphics2D;
import java.awt.PrintJob;
import java.awt.JobAttributes;
import java.awt.JobAttributes.*;
import java.awt.PageAttributes;
import java.awt.PageAttributes.*;
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk Aug 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wildcard..probably it should be removed as it is used in Delegate class

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, they aren't used in this class. I'll remove them.

@@ -0,0 +1,1233 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should it be 2000? its a new class but its content is from 2000!!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure what you are saying.
You seem to be saying it should say 2000 .. but it does .. and yes it should ...
The filename doesn't matter the material is what matters.

import java.awt.JobAttributes;
import java.awt.JobAttributes.*;
import java.awt.PageAttributes;
import java.awt.PageAttributes.*;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wildcard

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I'm not 'cleaning up' anything. I just moved it.

Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok otherwise..

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 1, 2025
/**
* Returns true if the last page will be printed first.
*/
public boolean lastPageFirst() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It appears to be unused.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because the method just returns false the delegate wasn't needed.
I decided to make it call the delegate anyway for consistency so now it is used.

Comment on lines 815 to 824
/* The caller wants a Graphics instance but we do
* not want them to make 2D calls. We can't hand
* back a Graphics2D. The returned Graphics also
* needs to implement PrintGraphics, so we wrap
* the Graphics2D instance. The PrintJob API has
* the application dispose of the Graphics so
* we create a copy of the one returned by PrinterJob.
*/
//printGraphics = new ProxyPrintGraphics(currentGraphics.create(), this);
printGraphics = currentGraphics.create();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need the comment on line 823?

The returned Graphics also to implement PrintGraphics, so we wrap the Graphics2D instance.

That doesn't seem true anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moving part of this comment back over to PrintJob2D.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 1, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 4, 2025
@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Aug 4, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Going to push as commit d1e362e.
Since your change was applied there have been 148 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 4, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2025

@prrace Pushed as commit d1e362e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants