Skip to content

Conversation

dougxc
Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc commented Aug 8, 2025

draft: ignore this PR until a proper description has been added


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8364729: Improve JVMCI annotation handling (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26704/head:pull/26704
$ git checkout pull/26704

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26704
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26704/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26704

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26704

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26704.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2025

@dougxc The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot-compiler
  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@Override
public String toString() {
return "" + target + ": " + count + ", " + secondaryIndex;
}
}

public static final class LocationInfo {
private final int depth;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The depth field was redundant so could be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant