-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8366908: Use a different class for testing JDK-8351654 #27116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 131 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
@@ -164,7 +163,8 @@ public static void main(String argv[]) throws Exception { | |||
} else { | |||
// Load the class instrumented with CFLH for the VerifyError. | |||
inst.addTransformer(new BadTransformer()); | |||
System.out.println("1 hour is " + Duration.ofHours(1).getSeconds() + " seconds"); | |||
Class<?> cls = Class.forName(CLASS_TO_BREAK); | |||
System.out.println("class loaded" + cls); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this println redundant, because the VerifyError is supposed to be thrown before? I think the old code uses Durations.ofHours
to trigger verification and initialization of Duration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not reached since we throw the VerifyError at line 166.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good from a ClassFile API perspective.
Thanks Chen and Leonid. |
Co-authored-by: ExE Boss <[email protected]>
Thanks Chen for re-approving. |
Going to push as commit 6765a9d.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
java.time.Duration is a migrated class (to be a value type) in the Valhalla repo, so it's preloaded, which causes this test to fail. Using a different java.base class achieves the purpose of this test.
Tested with tier1.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27116/head:pull/27116
$ git checkout pull/27116
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27116
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27116/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27116
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27116
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27116.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment