Skip to content

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Sep 5, 2025

java.time.Duration is a migrated class (to be a value type) in the Valhalla repo, so it's preloaded, which causes this test to fail. Using a different java.base class achieves the purpose of this test.
Tested with tier1.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8366908: Use a different class for testing JDK-8351654 (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27116/head:pull/27116
$ git checkout pull/27116

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27116
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27116/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27116

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27116

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27116.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@coleenp coleenp marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2025 11:35
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 5, 2025

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366908: Use a different class for testing JDK-8351654

Reviewed-by: liach, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 131 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 5, 2025

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-runtime [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 5, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -164,7 +163,8 @@ public static void main(String argv[]) throws Exception {
} else {
// Load the class instrumented with CFLH for the VerifyError.
inst.addTransformer(new BadTransformer());
System.out.println("1 hour is " + Duration.ofHours(1).getSeconds() + " seconds");
Class<?> cls = Class.forName(CLASS_TO_BREAK);
System.out.println("class loaded" + cls);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this println redundant, because the VerifyError is supposed to be thrown before? I think the old code uses Durations.ofHours to trigger verification and initialization of Duration.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not reached since we throw the VerifyError at line 166.

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good from a ClassFile API perspective.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 5, 2025
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Sep 5, 2025

Thanks Chen and Leonid.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 8, 2025
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Sep 8, 2025

Thanks Chen for re-approving.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Going to push as commit 6765a9d.
Since your change was applied there have been 133 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2025

@coleenp Pushed as commit 6765a9d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the fix-test branch September 8, 2025 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants