* Update UConn osg resources

[rjones30]

Align with recent resource hardware consolidation - Richard Jones

[osg-bot]

Greetings @rjones30,

Thank you for your pull request.

Your requested changes affect one or more downtime files, but are not eligible for downtime automerge; OSG Staff will need to manually review this PR.

-- OSG-BOT 🔍

---

Output from the automerge downtime check script:

Old Downtime 1734780663 modified for resource 'UConn-HPC_StashCache_origin'
Old Downtime 2151043084 modified for resource 'UConn-HPC_StashCache_origin'
Old Downtime 2146091711 modified for resource 'UConn-HPC_CE'
Commit is not eligible for auto-merge:
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn - cedar/SITE.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-HPC/SITE.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-HPC/UConn-HPC.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-OSG/SITE.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-OSG/UConn-OSG.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-Xanadu/SITE.yaml' is not a downtime file.
 - File 'topology/University of Connecticut/UConn-Xanadu/UConn-Xanadu.yaml' is not a downtime file.

[brianhlin]

@rjones30 you've marked this as "do-not-merge". What's left to be done here before we can review and merge?

[rjones30]

I did that in response to a request from Jeff on a recent ticket related to the PR, quoted below. -Richard Hi Richard, *Re:* https://support.opensciencegrid.org/support/tickets/public/f92fe477ce12a05e550fc33d7bf27522bde354e5c467a48d07d1e4cf08db1f9c <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.opensciencegrid.org%2Fsupport%2Ftickets%2Fpublic%2Ff92fe477ce12a05e550fc33d7bf27522bde354e5c467a48d07d1e4cf08db1f9c&data=05%7C02%7Crichard.t.jones%40uconn.edu%7Cd1aa0c34da9448e3c19a08ddfad9ab5f%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C638942534974550924%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zeDwkxrJBtSTT01FM1NSeRoAlNG5V9o5EOJyBxKX0%2Bc%3D&reserved=0> Sure you can create a topology pull request. But please tag it with the "do- not-merge" label on the pr. We've been trying to be more careful with our institution / cluster naming conventions, and I'd like Tim to be able to comment on it when he gets back. Thanks, Jeff

…

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 1:23 PM Brian Lin ***@***.***> wrote: *brianhlin* left a comment (opensciencegrid/topology#5056) <#5056 (comment)> @rjones30 <https://github.com/rjones30> you've marked this as "do-not-merge". What's left to be done here before we can review and merge? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5056 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3YKWALXXSXO35LJVKTED33ULHSZAVCNFSM6AAAAACHJ3CNVCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTGMRZHE2TANZWGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[osg-cat]

Richard, I looked through the updates and they seem fine to me, but I am not the final arbiter of what goes into Topology. However, I removed all of the “do not merge” bits and will follow up internally to get a final review and hopefully a merge. Thank you for all your effort in helping to clean up our Topology database!

— Tim C.

[matyasselmeci]

Two small changes but otherwise good.

[osg-cat]

@rjones30, there is nothing for you to do here — the PR is basically ready, and we are just waiting on GitHub to complete automated checks, then we plan to merge. However, GitHub is having some issues right at the moment.

— Tim C.