Skip to content

Conversation

@saw-jan
Copy link
Member

@saw-jan saw-jan commented Dec 31, 2024

By using the following as a cache path for linux-gcc-x86_64-squish craft target, we can separately define which Qt version to use for this target and we also omit the necessity of creating separate squish cache path

Packager/CacheVersion = ${Variables:ownCloudVersion}/Qt_${linux-gcc-x86_64-squish-BlueprintSettings:libs/qt6.version}_${Variables:CachePatchLvl}

This targets the linux cache folder of defined Qt version for libraries and we no longer require squish cache folder

@saw-jan saw-jan self-assigned this Dec 31, 2024
@saw-jan
Copy link
Member Author

saw-jan commented Dec 31, 2024

@DeepDiver1975 Could you check if this is valid and doesn't affect anything else?
I tested with craft and the the libraries are downloaded from the correct cache path

If we merge this then we can also remove these:

https://gitea.owncloud.services/client/build-craft-cache/src/commit/df5426a4b3d7c2c4f28e288a398366eda9feb17b/.drone.star#L10

This also?: https://gitea.owncloud.services/client/build-craft-cache/src/commit/df5426a4b3d7c2c4f28e288a398366eda9feb17b/craft_override.ini#L24-L32

@saw-jan saw-jan force-pushed the build/squish-cache-path branch from 02a4c37 to 0611a4b Compare January 21, 2025 04:58
@saw-jan
Copy link
Member Author

saw-jan commented Aug 25, 2025

this is no longer required.
See #12268

@saw-jan saw-jan closed this Aug 25, 2025
@saw-jan saw-jan deleted the build/squish-cache-path branch August 25, 2025 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants