Skip to content

Conversation

ashsearle
Copy link
Contributor

Reimplement #138 with clean commit history, but bringing in changes from #177 too.

@ashsearle ashsearle mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2017
src/index.js Outdated
a.setAttribute('href', url);
url = a.href;
}
let [,protocol,host,pathname,search,hash] = uriRegex.exec(url);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we skip the parse entirely and just do this?

return a.pathname + a.search + a.hash;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I may have been worrying about server-side (nodejs) rendering where we don't have an a to do URL resolution: is that a valid concern?

If not, I'll happily simplify.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can probably skip the SSR concern for now - route() should be a no-op there anyway since SSR is single-pass.

@developit developit self-assigned this Dec 25, 2017
@ehinter
Copy link

ehinter commented Feb 24, 2018

@developit Any plans to merge this?

@sanghin
Copy link

sanghin commented Mar 21, 2018

@developit can i help for this PR ? I need it badly 😅


// attempt to route, if no match simply cede control to browser
return route(href);
return route(node.pathname + node.search + node.hash);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this could use node.href.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ashsearle ashsearle Mar 21, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's been a while since I wrote this, but think the reason I did this was for some sort of consistency with getCurrentUrl (which omits protocol/host/port)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants