Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Coming soon: The Renovate bot (GitHub App) will be renamed to Mend. PRs from Renovate will soon appear from 'Mend'. Learn more here.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
eslint-plugin-promise 6.6.0 -> 7.2.1 age confidence

Release Notes

eslint-community/eslint-plugin-promise (eslint-plugin-promise)

v7.2.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • no-callback-in-promise: false triggering of callback (#​574) (8324564)
🧹 Chores

v7.2.0

Compare Source

🌟 Features
🩹 Fixes
  • permit appropriate computed member expressions and prototype access (#​535) (4de9d43)
🧹 Chores

v7.1.0

Compare Source

🌟 Features
  • catch-or-return, prefer-await-to-then: do not report Cypress commands (#​495) (943f162)
  • prefer-await-to-then: ignore constructor scope unless with strict option (#​496) (7bffb7a)
  • new rule spec-only to check for non-spec Promise methods (#​502) (d6e9de1)
📚 Documentation
🧹 Chores

v7.0.0

Compare Source

BREAKING CHANGES
  • Requires Node.js: ^18.18.0 || ^20.9.0 || >=21.1.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jul 24, 2024

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json
npm ERR! code ERESOLVE
npm ERR! ERESOLVE could not resolve
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! While resolving: [email protected]
npm ERR! Found: [email protected]
npm ERR! node_modules/eslint-plugin-promise
npm ERR!   dev eslint-plugin-promise@"7.2.1" from the root project
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! Could not resolve dependency:
npm ERR! peer eslint-plugin-promise@"^6.0.0" from [email protected]
npm ERR! node_modules/eslint-config-standard
npm ERR!   dev eslint-config-standard@"17.1.0" from the root project
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! Conflicting peer dependency: [email protected]
npm ERR! node_modules/eslint-plugin-promise
npm ERR!   peer eslint-plugin-promise@"^6.0.0" from [email protected]
npm ERR!   node_modules/eslint-config-standard
npm ERR!     dev eslint-config-standard@"17.1.0" from the root project
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm ERR! this command with --force, or --legacy-peer-deps
npm ERR! to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! See /runner/cache/others/npm/eresolve-report.txt for a full report.

npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
npm ERR!     /runner/cache/others/npm/_logs/2025-09-25T16_00_04_262Z-debug-0.log

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-promise-7.x branch from a907e90 to f589bdb Compare August 6, 2024 14:10
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-promise-7.x branch 2 times, most recently from 398996a to ae71327 Compare November 27, 2024 04:37
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-plugin-promise-7.x branch from ae71327 to 3f43a92 Compare August 10, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants