Skip to content

Conversation

@justinchuby
Copy link
Contributor

@justinchuby justinchuby commented Sep 13, 2025

Description

The JIT strategy was removed and is thus no longer usable. Removing the section.

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description (see above "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER")
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

Fixes #3563

cc @titaiwangms @xadupre

The JIT strategy was removed and is thus no longer usable. Removing the section.
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 13, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/3564

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 6407a41 with merge base c4d9d93 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@svekars svekars added the onnx Issues relating to ONNX label Sep 15, 2025
@svekars svekars merged commit 91a1891 into pytorch:main Sep 15, 2025
21 checks passed
@svekars svekars added the 2.9 label Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2.9 cla signed onnx Issues relating to ONNX

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] - Export a model with control flow to ONNX is failing against the 2.9 binaries

3 participants