firmware-boot: correct the license file and hash values #1337
Conversation
According to the latest legal guideline, correct the license information used for non-login boot binaries. Signed-off-by: Shoudi Li <[email protected]>
shoudil
requested review from
lumag,
ndechesne,
ricardosalveti,
sbanerjee-quic and
vkraleti
as code owners
|
|
||
| SRC_URI = " \ | ||
| https://${FW_ARTIFACTORY}/${FW_BUILD_ID}/${FW_BIN_PATH}/${BOOTBINARIES}.zip;downloadfilename=${BOOTBINARIES}_r1.0_${PV}.zip;name=bootbinaries \ | ||
| https://${FW_ARTIFACTORY}/${FW_BUILD_ID}/LICENSE.txt;downloadfilename=LICENSE.${BPN};name=license \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nope. Please don't download licences separately, they should be moved into the tarballs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currently all the LICENSE files for these QLI targets are present outside of tarballs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On QCLI1.0, the initial intention should be re-use the same LICENSE for boot binaries tarball and firmware libs tarball.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So, it should be pushed in. I'm fine to upgrade the LICENSE variable in the recipes, but also please make sure that platform teams get licences sorted out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The firmware-qcom-boot-xxx recipes also take care of CDT tarball, then need to push LICENSE in it as well ?
Test run workflowTest jobs for commit 4d296d3
|
2 participants
According to the latest legal guideline, correct the license information used for non-login boot binaries.