Skip to content

Conversation

TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This fixes a handful of type annotations in cudf-polars that are missed because we don't have some dependencies in the type checker's environment (e.g. polars). Running with those packages turned up a few (mostly harmless) issues.

This fixes a handful of type annotations in cudf-polars that are
missed because we don't have some dependencies in the type checker's
environment (e.g. polars).
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Python Affects Python cuDF API. cudf-polars Issues specific to cudf-polars labels Sep 29, 2025
@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok to test 7cfce3f

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger added the improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function label Sep 29, 2025
@GPUtester GPUtester moved this to In Progress in cuDF Python Sep 29, 2025
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger added the non-breaking Non-breaking change label Sep 29, 2025
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2025 13:43
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2025 13:43
@Matt711
Copy link
Contributor

Matt711 commented Sep 30, 2025

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 53c17fe into rapidsai:branch-25.12 Sep 30, 2025
130 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in cuDF Python Sep 30, 2025
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger deleted the tom/cudf-polars-type-fixes branch September 30, 2025 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cudf-polars Issues specific to cudf-polars improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants