Skip to content

Conversation

@divyeshagrawal
Copy link
Contributor

@divyeshagrawal divyeshagrawal commented Nov 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

发布说明

  • Chores
    • 移除了两个开发依赖项,精简了项目配置。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2025

概述

从 package.json 中移除了两个开发依赖项:coveralls 和 cross-env。这是一项依赖清理的更改,不涉及脚本、公开 API 或控制流的修改。

变更

文件组 / 文件 变更摘要
开发依赖清理
package.json
移除了 coveralls 和 cross-env 这两个 devDependencies

预估代码审查工作量

🎯 1 (简单) | ⏱️ ~3 分钟

无需额外关注的特殊区域。

诗文

🐰 轻轻挥手说再见,
两个依赖去远山,
项目更清爽明亮,
代码库焕然一新般,
简约之美永驻心间。 ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed PR标题准确概括了主要变更:从package.json中删除未使用的依赖项。
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17f20cd and c46bf8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Socket Security: Pull Request Alerts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @divyeshagrawal, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on project maintenance by eliminating two development dependencies, 'coveralls' and 'cross-env', that are no longer utilized. This action streamlines the project's dependency tree, potentially reducing build times and overall package size by removing unnecessary overhead.

Highlights

  • Dependency Removal: The development dependencies 'coveralls' and 'cross-env' have been removed from the 'package.json' file.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the coveralls and cross-env dependencies from devDependencies. My review of the scripts within package.json confirms that these packages are not being used, so their removal is appropriate. This is a good housekeeping change that reduces the project's dependency footprint.

@socket-security
Copy link

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm buffer-okam is 96.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.96

Location: Package overview

From: ?npm/[email protected]

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at [email protected].

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected]. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm buffer is 96.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.96

Location: Package overview

From: ?npm/[email protected]

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at [email protected].

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected]. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@afc163 afc163 merged commit ff6b020 into react-component:master Nov 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.00%. Comparing base (17f20cd) to head (c46bf8c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #79   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.00%   99.00%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         201      201           
  Branches       62       62           
=======================================
  Hits          199      199           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants