Skip to content

Add RxDisposableRecord and update to .NET 9 #160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ChrisPulman
Copy link
Member

This pull request updates copyright years across multiple files and upgrades the target framework for the project files. The most notable changes involve updating the copyright year to reflect 2025 and switching the target framework from .NET 6.0 to .NET 9.0.

Copyright Updates:

  • Updated copyright year from 2019-2024 to 2019-2025 across all source files, including benchmark files (DummyReactiveObject.cs, DummyRxObject.cs, ReactiveObjectMemoryBenchmark.cs, RxObjectMemoryBenchmark.cs, etc.), test files (AsLazyValueExtensionsTests.cs, AsValueExtensionsTests.cs, ReactivePropertyVM.cs, etc.), and other related files. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

Target Framework Upgrade:

  • Upgraded the target framework in the project files ReactiveMarbles.Mvvm.Benchmarks.csproj and ReactiveMarbles.Mvvm.Tests.csproj from .NET 6.0 to .NET 9.0. This change ensures compatibility with newer features and optimizations available in .NET 9.0. [1] [2]

Introduces RxDisposableRecord for disposable record support. Updates target frameworks in projects to .NET 9.0, and updates copyright years to 2025. Refactors ReactiveProperty<T> to inherit from RxDisposableObject and improves subscription/disposal logic.
@ChrisPulman ChrisPulman merged commit ca92656 into main Jul 28, 2025
1 check passed
@ChrisPulman ChrisPulman deleted the CP_FIxRxPropUpdateDate branch July 28, 2025 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant