-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
feat: Rust SignClient #200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Claude finished @jakubuid's task —— View job 🔄 PR Review: Rust SignClient ImplementationMajor Issues Found1. Security Concerns
2. Code Quality Issues
3. Memory and Resource Management
4. Thread Safety Issues
5. Database Migration Risks
6. Integration Issues
7. Performance Concerns
Specific File Issues:
Recommendations:
Impact: High - This introduces significant security vulnerabilities, incomplete functionality, and potential stability issues that could affect production use. |
|
Claude finished @jakubuid's task —— View job 🔄 Incremental Review: Latest Commits AnalysisIssues Still Present From Previous Review1. Security Concerns - Confirmed Still Present
2. Code Quality Issues - Confirmed Still Present
3. Memory and Resource Management - Confirmed Still Present
4. Database Migration Issues - Confirmed Still Present
New Issues in Latest Commits (Last 5 commits)1. Session Disconnect Logic (
2. Session Request Context (
Issues Fixed Since Previous Review✅ None identified - All major security and code quality issues from the previous review remain unresolved. SummaryCritical Action Required: All major issues from the previous review remain unaddressed. The latest commits focus on disconnect/reject functionality but don't address the core security vulnerabilities:
Impact: High - The PR still contains significant security vulnerabilities and incomplete functionality that make it unsuitable for production use. |
|
Claude finished @jakubuid's task —— View job 🔄 Incremental Review: Rust SignClient ImplementationIssues Still Present From Previous Review1. Security Concerns - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
2. Code Quality Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
3. Memory and Resource Management - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
4. Database Migration Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
New Issues in Latest Commits5. Session Disconnect Logic (
6. Session Request Context (
Issues Fixed Since Previous Review✅ None identified - All major issues from the previous review remain unaddressed. SummaryCritical Action Required: All major security and code quality issues from the previous review remain unresolved. The latest 5 commits focused on session lifecycle (extend, disconnect, reject) but failed to address core problems: Immediate Priority Actions:
Impact: High - The PR contains significant security vulnerabilities and incomplete functionality making it unsuitable for production use. The recent commits addressed session management but ignored the fundamental issues that would cause security breaches and application crashes. |
|
Claude finished @jakubuid's task —— View job 🔄 Incremental Review: Rust SignClient ImplementationTodo List
Issues Still Present From Previous Review1. Security Concerns - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
2. Code Quality Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
3. Memory and Resource Management - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
4. Database Migration Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
New Issues in Latest Commits5. Session Disconnect Logic (
6. Session Request Context (
Issues Fixed Since Previous Review✅ None identified - All major issues from the previous review remain unaddressed. SummaryCritical Action Required: All major security and code quality issues from the previous review remain unresolved. The latest commits focused on session lifecycle (extend, disconnect, reject) but failed to address core problems: Immediate Priority Actions:
Impact: High - The PR contains significant security vulnerabilities and incomplete functionality making it unsuitable for production use. The recent commits addressed session management but ignored the fundamental issues that would cause security breaches and application crashes. |
…nto sign_rust_client # Conflicts: # core/android/build.gradle.kts # sample/common/src/main/kotlin/com/reown/sample/common/ui/WCTopAppBar.kt
|
Claude finished @jakubuid's task —— View job 🔄 Incremental Review: Rust SignClient ImplementationReview Tasks
Issues Still Present From Previous Review1. Security Concerns - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
2. Code Quality Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
3. Memory and Resource Management - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
4. Database Migration Issues - CONFIRMED STILL PRESENT
New Issues in Latest Commits5. Hard-coded Disconnect/Reject Reasons
Issues Fixed Since Previous Review✅ None identified - All major issues from the previous review remain unaddressed. SummaryCritical Action Required: All major security and code quality issues from previous reviews remain unresolved. The latest commits (handling JSON RPC history, session events, updates) did not address the fundamental problems: Immediate Priority Actions:
Impact: High - The PR contains significant security vulnerabilities and incomplete functionality making it unsuitable for production use. The recent commits improved session handling but ignored fundamental security and stability issues. |
|



No description provided.